Hollowing ‘I’ in the authorship of letters: A note on Flusser and surveillance
Although the 24-hour news cycle has recently moved on from Snowden and surveillance to cover the latest set of unfortunate circumstances on Capitol Hill, there are some points I would like to make regarding the role of surveillance in the further dissolution of any sense of a human author that might underlie the use of ‘I’ in a written communication. Much of what is discussed here focuses on the idea of the author as presented by Vilem Flusser in ‘Does Writing Have a Future,’ in a chapter about letters. For purposes of clarity, I’ve relied on cryptographers’ lingo to describe two communicators (Adam and Bob) and one eavesdropper (Eve). As a final introductory caveat, I’ve taken emails to be technologically analogous to written letters, with one major distinction being the facility with which one email can be sent to multiple intended recipients.
Much in the same way that Meyer-Schonberger (2011) argued that the default setting of memory in the digital age is no longer forgetting, we seem to have reached a point where the default setting of written communication is no longer dyadic, or even (n)adic where multiple recipients are intended. Instead, and assuming that email has functionally replaced the written letter at the level of formal interpersonal communication, we must assume that written communication is (n+x)adic where n = (author + number of intended recipients) and x = an unknown number of electronic eavesdroppers.
Flusser argues that personal written communications are one of the few forms of writing that are intended to convey a personal understanding of the author, not of the written artifact the author produces. I am myself when I write to my friends, and in reading my letters and emails, my friends reconstruct my self-representation as they know me. Personal affiliation amends what Foucault called the ‘author function’ (Foucault, 1969) in such a way that the author behind the ‘I’ becomes perceivable. When we increase the number of implied readers to whom a letter’s author is not personally known (represented as x), we’re reducing the identify of the author, stealing bit by bit the interpersonal, communicative functionality of a letter. I, the author known personally to you, the reader, become less myself through the interpretive forces of the unknown quantity (x).
Personal communications were once one of the only written refuges of identity, where ‘I’ referred to the author in his/her direct relation to an intended recipient. In an age where surveillance is the default setting, ‘I’ becomes even hollower on the page than Barthes, Foucault, and all the rest claimed. Moreover, its hollowness is not benign and static, but ambivalent and ephemeral, filled up by correlations to myriad points of myriad types of data at the touch of an (xkeystroke) button, rendering the author nothing more than a predictable set of patterns defined by second-hand empiricism. In a communication intercepted by (x), my ‘I’ becomes further estranged from me, as if its existence on an inanimate screen weren’t enough, and replaced by the construction of an ‘author’ unknown to (x). Thus, through surveillance, it is as though the author of an interpersonal communication is reduced to something less than a person, something artificial, constructed, and somehow hollower. As a side effect of surveillance, the author of a letter or email becomes as fictive and a priori as the author-function found in a novel.
I greatly appreciate all that’s shared on this blog. Wonderful web site. Plenty of useful info here. Thanks
Wonderful post. Thanks for the post
Great info thanks for sharing
This blog too old and not update.But this information is good! Thanks for sharing!
Wonderful post. Thanks for the post
Download Bigo Live App for Windows Phone
This article and this blog from March 19, 2014, too old. Please update!
It’s going to be finish of mine day, but before end I am reading this great
piece of writing to improve my experience.
why this blog not update with new article?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on VInhomes Royal City.
Regards
Really amazing and informative article. Just want to thanks for it.
ya nice article share by your team… Download vidmate for video downloading.
I read your entire article and I genuinely like it.
I have done plenty of research on this niche.
May I simply say what a relief to find someone who actually knows
what they are discussing on the web. You definitely understand how to bring an issue to light and
make it important. More people need to look at this and understand
this side of your story. I was surprised that you aren’t more popular given that you certainly
possess the gift.
You could certainly see your skills within the article you write.
The sector hopes for even more passionate writers such as you who aren’t
afraid to say how they believe. At all times follow
your heart.
Great info thanks for sharing.
Thanks for sharing the info.
Amazing info. Thanks for sharing online.
I’m really glad to view your blog.
Your efforts are to be surely appreciated. Well Done Admin.
Amazing blog my friend i like it so much keep going bro!
Amazing blog my friend i like it so much keep going bro!
Thanks for sharing the info.
Thanks for the information.
Nice information.
nice information thanks alot for sharing this with us
this is such an informative post i have ever seen
Your site is really nice and unique. This is one of the best ideas that you had come up for the people and I do hope that they can have a better future.
This blog is too old, why not update it?
thanks a lot for sharing this with us
Just let me know how we can accomplish this task. Let me go find hope for this life: basketball games
Great topic and article. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for sharing the info.